ladder bottom
Members
Selection Criteria Myths

These collection of myths have been collected over the years from not only applicants, but also career counsellors!  They have been tried, tested and talked about and proven to be false in the government recruitment industry. It just goes to show that you should choose your advice wisely, and make sure it is coming from an authoritive source!  

These myths were first published in "Get That Job! The Best Guide to Applying for a Government Job" which is available on this website.

X The shorter my statements are the better, that way the selection panel are more likely to remember what I say.
If you don’t provide enough information to substantiate your claims, the panel won’t remember what you say because your application will be in the “no” pile.
X Longer applications allow you to expand upon your credentials, and you should use the application as the opportunity to say everything, in case you don’t get an interview.
Not only will too much information not be remembered, but it probably won’t even be read.  Panels do not like ploughing through lengthy applications and may end up skim reading yours, which means they will not take in much of your application at all.
X Unique looking applications will stand out from the crowd, so it is good to use stand out fonts and coloured paper.
It is always better to conform with what others are doing, and follow general expectations.  Employers generally don’t want employees who don’t conform, so presenting yourself in your application as someone who goes against the flow with isn’t a good starting point.

Selection Criteria Myths Page 1  |  Selection Criteria Myths Page 2  |  Selection Criteria Myths Page 3


privacy | disclaimer | copyright |

Copyright 2007 Review Consulting - Design by TheMilkAgency.com.au