ladder bottom
For Panel Members
These rating scales are freely available on the internet and Review Consulting does not hold any copyright.

Jump to:
Rating Scale 1
Rating Scale 2
Rating Scale 3
Rating Scale 4
Rating Sheet


Rating Scale 4

Rating 

Indicators of Performance

Excellent 
The candidate possesses exceptionally well developed and relevant skills and abilities, as well as the appropriate personal qualities, and his/her performance is outstanding.
  Requires no supervision.


Very Good   


The candidate possesses highly developed and relevant skills and abilities, as well as the appropriate personal qualities, and his/her performance clearly exceeds requirements.  Requires virtually no supervision.

Good


The candidate possesses highly developed and relevant skills and abilities, as well as the appropriate personal qualities, and has demonstrated competency at the required level.  Works well with limited supervision.
Satisfactory


The candidate possesses relevant skills, abilities and personal qualities, and his/her performance is of a Satisfactory standard.  He/she would be able to adequately carry out the duties, given routine supervision and guidance.
Requires Development /

Unsatisfactory

The candidate requires further training/development and would benefit from ongoing experience to enable his/her performance to reach a Satisfactory standard.  The candidate would not be able to adequately carry out the full duties at this stage, but has the potential to progress further.  Requires supervision when undertaking more difficult tasks.

The candidate is unable to demonstrate that he/she possesses relevant skills, abilities and personal qualities to a Satisfactory standard. Requires constant supervision.




homenewsletter | selection criteria | interviews | vacancies | products | services | for panel members |
privacy | disclaimer | copyright
Design by TheMilkAgency.com.au  - Copyright 2007 Review Consulting